Moonbat Media Madness in Memphis

George Soros pumps in the dollars, and a media conference is born.

Accuracy in Media has its own report on how the moonbats argue for more government “control” in the media, “equal time,” and much more…including remarks by Tennessee’s newly elected Congressman Steve Cohen:

At the same time, Kincaid noted that one conference speaker, freshman Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), pledged to protect or even increase taxpayer funding for public broadcasting that he admits is on the “left hand side of the dial.”

And this:

Less than two weeks after Democrats took control of both houses of Congress, Accuracy in Media has exposed a plan by congressional liberals to use the federal government to silence conservative voices in the media.

Reporting from a so-called National Conference on Media Reform, organized by “progressive” activists, AIM editor Cliff Kincaid has revealed, in an exclusive report now available on the AIM web site (www.aim.org), that liberals in the House and Senate intend to push legislation giving the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the authority to monitor and restrict what conservatives in the media say and how they say it. Kincaid quotes Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) as saying that he wants to put an end to the influence of conservative media personalities he finds to be “neo-fascist” and “neo-con.” Their legislative vehicle is revival of a “fairness doctrine” giving FCC bureaucrats the ability to grant liberal activists “equal access” to conservative programs on radio and television. Senator Bernie Sanders, an avowed socialist, told the conference he would push such a measure in the Senate.

Kincaid calls the approach “authoritarian” and a threat to freedom of speech in the U.S.

You can access Kincaid’s report here. It is a great read, with stuff like this from the Memphis Conference:

The Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), which opposes the Chinese communist government as too capitalist, was one of the official exhibitors. Also on hand, displaying banners calling for the impeachment of President Bush, was the so-called 9/11 truth movement, which holds that Muslims were blamed for the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon when U.S. officials actually carried them out.

Other exhibitors included the Newspaper Guild, Consumers Union, Mother Jones magazine, Pacifica Radio, and Amy Goodman, host of “Democracy Now.”

Why is it that people who call themselves LIBERAL actually want more government control?

There’s more golden nuggets too in the report, like this:

Sanders, who votes with the Democrats in the Senate despite his official status as an independent socialist, claimed conservatives were 99 percent in control of talk radio and that it was time “to open the question of the fairness doctrine again” to restrict what they say and how they say it.

He faulted the media for covering two sides of the global warming debate “when there is no debate in the scientific community.”

Hmmm. No debate in the scientific community?

Don’t forget to check out Tennessee’s own Mick Wright and his report on the Marxists in Memphis.

UPDATE: Bill Hobbs has a write up with a good excerpt from a Democrat blogger, as well as this link to Mick’s Part II on the Media Conference.  Hobbs writes:

…media blogger Richard Thompson, a Democrat and journalist, who wrote at his thoughtful MediaVerse blog:

The NCMR says its non-partisan but it isn’t.

This conference has been a pseudo-Democratic convention, complete with a party presidential hopeful dropping in for a “surprise” appearance. (Do you think I’m that gullible?) I’m a lifelong Democrat, but as a journalist I can step outside of that allegiance because at times it’s necessary for the sake of credibility.

5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I wonder if a regular station could sue saying that the NPR and the PBS stations have an unfair advantage. Sort of how some of the mail distrobution companies are sueing the post ofice.

“Why is it that people who call themselves LIBERAL actually want more government control?”

Actually, what we want is for the PEOPLE to have more control. That, and more to choose from besides Steve Gill and G. Gordon Liddy.

Oh Mary, that’s a bunch of bull. The people do have control. So how do you propose equal time? That folks like Steve Gill bust their rears to get sponsors, to stay up late doing research, call to get guests, and then you want an opposing opinion just handed over to someone? You think because he did the work, you’d be “entitled” to an opposing opinion?
And just who is going to be the judge of what you call “equal”?

No one forced Air America out of business. It’s just a fact that talk radio success tends conservative.

Your opinion implies that LISTENERS…”people” as you call them, are dumb. Your opinion implies they are incabable of choice.

I don’t see any poster boards or tin foil protests in front of most newspapers across the land. A clear majority of editorial boards across the state and country write very liberal editorials. And they do it daily.
Do you see conservatives marching for your so called “equal time?” No, we gripe about their liberalism, but we haven’t advocated for some government financed newspaper so that we can have our own editorials.

Please, the people you speak of are the same people you are going to soak to pay for your attempt at control of the airwaves.

If we follow your line of thinking, I guess private property would be a thing of the past as well.  It would only be fair if the “people” owned all land, right?

Liberal…not! Dictatorial…yes! Marxist, indeed.

We, the people, own the airwaves. All the people – liberals and conservatives. We entrust the government to award licenses to those that pledge to serve the publish interest. Comparing newspapers to radio and TV licenses is like comparing Limbaughs to Frankens.

Did you know that the FCC is about to award radio broadcast licenses for available 100,000 watt signals across the country to anyone who wants them? For free? The competition will be fierce because radio stations with 100,000 watt signals are a license to print money.

I said it before and I’ll say it again. If someone has been awarded one of our licenses and can’t make it work as a viable business with some diversity of opinion in their programming, then give the license to one of the 7,000 of us waiting in line to give it a go.

Mary–who is going to be the judge of what you believe is diversity?

I believe you are advocating for equality of outcome…not equality of opportunity. In the marketplace, little shops, businesses, & ideas pop up all the time. There is no guarantee that people will buy your product.

Radio tries time and time again to have “liberal” talk…but it just doesn’t work. Does that mean liberals don’t listen to radio? No, maybe they choose something else…perhaps music?

Perhaps they prefer the jazz tunes in coffee shops across America.

The political rabidness of a few leftists can’t carry the load for a majority of your demographic. In other words, because your passions run deep, doesn’t mean that others will join you and that your enterprise will suceed. Which is why folks like those at the Media “Reform” conference want Government (me and my family and friends) to pay for its viability.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)