Bredesen’s mouthpiece likes easy pickings

It sure sounds to me like Governor Phil Bredesen’s revenue man, Reagan Farr, is saying that the “adult” porno business is an underground economy that he can’t be bothered to pursue.

In opposing an increased tax on pornography, join me in reading what Farr says, in today’s Sentinel:

“You’re shifting from a population of taxpayers who are stable and identifiable — grocery stores — and shifting the tax burden to a base of taxpayers that are not stable and very difficult to identify,” said Farr, the state’s top revenue official. “We would have difficulty collecting from them.”

And exactly why would that be, Reagan Farr? You’re telling us that you want to get tax on groceries but you’re content to let the sex industry slide? My understanding of any business is that they have to register, get a business liscense, collect sales tax, etc. Is Farr claiming that the State of Tennessee can’t be bothered to make sure they’re in compliance? Accountants, lawyers, doctors, etc. all must pay a fee to the state. You can’t do the same for the escort services that are listed boldly in the yellow pages of your local phone book?

Please, this bill isn’t a tax on the illegal prostitution business. But from Farr’s record on the crack tax, it seems like he might favor such an idea. As we know, Farr is all behind the constitutionally suspect “crack tax” that he claims makes bundles for the state. From Farr’s line of thinking, the state legislature ought to create a licensing program for prositutes. If a prostitute is arrested and charged and doesn’t have her/his license, then she/he would pay additional penalties.

Farr’s opposition is pure politics and pure laziness. It’s also an insult to those who are honest and by that I mean that Farr implies that he opposes the idea because he prefers “easy” pickings when it comes to collecting tax dollars. In this case, easy would imply honest.

6 Comments so far
Leave a comment

[...] on the tax on spanking your monkey. And, speaking of the tax on punching the clown, Terry Frank has more. And since we’re discussing rubbing one out, the story has made the national [...]

What are the administrative costs to identify adult materials by performer and distributor and what are the related accounting and manpower costs to enforce the tax?

What are the administrative costs (public and private) to identify whole foods by grower, manuf., distributor and related accounting costs to retailers? That’s how much the cost of whole foods will increase to the consumer, to whom the costs are passed on, when you decrease the tax.

How is it constitutional to levy a tax on speech (adult material performances ) based on content when other similarly protected speech is not taxed. Isn’t it an infringement if the government places a financial burden (tax) on one speech based on its content and not another?

Why does Campfield’s bill exempt R and NC17 movies when more people are exposed to that medium of adult material than any other? (I don’t have that quantified but it would have to be close to tops)

Carpenter: Before I get into detail on your post, have you ever been to Pigeon Forge?

Yes

Frank, you might as well have posted:

“Calf Rope!”

nice talking to you,
SC

Carpenter: how is any entertainment ever taxed? You think gettin’ it or dancing naked on a pole is like reading a book? Or is it entertainment?

For escort services, you would have a licensing fee…just like most every profession in this state has a fee.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)