Health Care
Bloomberg has the latest on the proposed Democrat “hope and change” coming down the pike:
June 12 (Bloomberg) — Health-care overhaul legislation being drafted by House Democrats will include $600 billion in tax increases and $400 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel said.
Now as Ed Morrissey points out, when President Bush tried to tackle the issue, he was demonized by the Democrats. Writes Ed:
When George Bush tried to tackle escalating Medicare and Medicaid costs and a looming entitlement catastrophe with modest funding cuts in both terms in office, Democrats screeched about seniors losing health care and pronounced Bush’s efforts dead on arrival on Capitol Hill. Now, with Barack Obama in the White House, Democrats have suddenly gone mute as the administration proposes to cut hundreds of billions from both programs.
And here’s a video flashback via Hot Air:
Of course I’m guessing the strategy is cutting the benefits in order to make way for all that “free” health-care coming our way, right? But Investors Business Daily notes that the AMA is finally kicking into gear on the issue:
Health Care: With much of Washington determined to push the country into a government-run medical plan, there’s not been much good news lately on this front. One bright spot, though, has emerged this week.
The largest group of doctors in the country has made it clear that it is not comfortable with legislation that would twist the country’s health care system into a Euro-style scheme that “threatens to restrict patient choice.”
Now as someone who avoids the medical system that I love and brag about as much as possible, I found myself in need of a trip to the ER last weekend. I was pretty sure the nauseating, paralyzing pain was a kidney stone. It’ll pass, I thought. But Mom said I must go see the good folks at MMC and make sure.
And so our very own Methodist Medical Center and their very fine staff gave me the most wonderful service in the world. It was as enjoyable as a trip to the ER could possibly be. Doctor Awesome told me that he thought I was right about the stone but they wanted to make sure. So they did all the necessary tests, including blood work and a CT. And guess what? No waiting lists for the CT scan. No “hey girl, come back in 4 weeks to see if it really is a kidney stone.” No, right here in the good ole’ US of A, right here in Oak Ridge, Tennessee I had my scan in an instant. And because the radiologist had gone home for the evening, a good Doctor in California read my results. Yep, “6 mm”, he said.
And so the Doctor and I and my family all made a decision on the best course of action and in just a touch over 2 hours from sign in to sign out, I was on my way and ready for work the next morning.
Now I encourage you to think about all the tests I needed being available at a moments notice. And then watch this video. And if you have time, watch the next one as well. ”Free” isn’t all they claim it to be.

6 Comments so far
Leave a comment
So the message is that if Canada had a healthcare financing system like we do she would have received timely and effective care?
By SemiPundit on 06.16.09 10:26 pm
Semi: putting politicians in charge of health care is the wrong answer. They already brought us to this point.
Think about how they affected price with the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid. My father was from rural Appalachia and dirt poor. The doctors and the dentists knew who was poor and they helped.
Lee’s Dad was a dentist and did the same thing.
But it’s funny isn’t it that government says doctors can’t perform charity care—can’t write it off, can’t devote a day to seeing the poor.
We can’t have that, can we? After all, it’s the great government gods that are supposed to be in the charity business, right? For votes?
And not only that, our doctors might actually know who in the community is just gaming and who is really in need. We can’t have folks making that decision either.
This Canada video shows perfectly well how you end up playing politics to see who gets the care.
By Terry on 06.17.09 4:27 am
If you really want to know what Congress thinks about this plan to spend $1.6 trillion for 10-16 million uninsured then see if Congress exempts itself.
If it’s not good enough for them then why in hell is it good enough for the rest of us?
By Pogo on 06.18.09 7:50 am
Footnote, the Dems also want to exempt union contracts from any of the proposed payroll or benefit taxes.
So it’s not good enough for Congress or the unions but it’s good enough for the rest of us.
By Pogo on 06.19.09 3:01 pm
Do you agree that all of the money paid out in the U.S. on insurance premiums would be better spent on actual healthcare, rather than on a bloated, inefficient system that is rife with corruption, benefit denial, enormous compensation for executives, flat-out ownership of our government, and is a total disgrace of everything America stands for?
Is good health a right or a privilege?
Also, what should an American worker whose job is outsourced overseas for a fraction of his or her wages do after COBRA has eaten away every dime of life savings, cancer has set in, and there is no hope of paying for care because of the preexisting condition?
By SemiPundit on 06.19.09 9:28 pm
Just as I expected.
By SemiPundit on 06.25.09 9:07 am
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>