Nidal Hasan helps shape Homeland Security
By Emmanuel Goldstein
How? Why? Is there any reason that President Obama doesn’t want a Congressional Investigation into Major Hasan? Maybe someone dropped a word in his ear?
According to Time Magazine, some of those that knew Hasah said, “political correctness led their superiors to ignore the warning signs witnessed by students and faculty at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md.”
The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences is kinda important here. Hold onto that.
The George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute wrote Thinking Anew -Security Priorities for the Next Administration Proceedings Report of the HSPI Presidential Transaction Task Force. This is dated April 2008 – January 2009.
This report was to help shape our nations security.
This report deals with a number of issues to include our role in the world. But if someone looks at the list of Task Force Participants, closely, on page 29 on the left side of the page, you will clearly see the name of Nidal Hasan, Uniformed Services University School of Medicine.
Is this a case of PC gone wrong? Was he that far under the radar? Didn’t he already have a history by this time and yet they allow him to shape security policy for our nation?
What are the odds that there are two individuals with the same name at the same school?
As Americans, we owe it to ourselves to learn more about those that RULE us.
7 Comments so far
Leave a comment
I am of the opinion that Obama doesn’t care about anybody’s security but his own, and his family’s. I would very much like to see if he would like to have a security detail made up of muslims. How many muslims ARE there in the Secret Service? None, I bet.
By TNOPINION on 11.19.09 6:06 pm
Can a Muslim be a patriotic American citizen?
By SemiPundit on 11.20.09 8:32 am
http://frontpagemag.com/2009/11/20/major-hasan%E2%80%99s-islamist-life-%E2%80%93-by-daniel-pipes/
here is an update about this major.
By Rosine Ghawji on 11.20.09 9:36 am
Not one that shoots his fellow soldiers. At least not by my definition of patriotic. But with this administration redefining the word “patriotic” who knows how it will end.
If by asking that question, are you implying that Hasan was patriotic? Are you implying that Hasan was your idea of a typical Mulsim? Or are you looking for a way to justify his actions as that of a nutcase instead of the terrorist that he is?
By BCB on 11.20.09 9:52 am
OK, then, how about one who does not shoot his fellow soldiers?
By SemiPundit on 11.23.09 4:20 pm
According to Islam, they cannot be patriotic. They have loyalty to Islam which is both a religion and a form of goverment.
They believe in dhimmitude which is a second class citizenry based on religion.
They believe in a one world government known as the caliphate. They take religious law from the Koran and sometimes the Sunna and make it so based on the opinions of appointed and non-elected leaders. They don’t believe in equal rights for women according to their religion.
We could go on, but since Islam is at odds with so many of our basic freedoms, I don’t see how a “good” Muslim could also be a Patriotic American.
By BCB on 11.25.09 12:25 pm
On dec 16, 2009 an executive order was made to keep the records of this investigation off limits off limits off limits. visit the white house web page to find out how Interpol (international police that investigates terrorism) has been granted total legal immunity and their main headquarters is in the justice department in Washington dc
By connect dots on 01.07.10 2:56 pm
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>